Correcting a missing OER in your iPERMS record after a deployment
For soldiers returning from a deployment, nothing derails a promotion packet faster than opening iPERMS and discovering that an Officer Evaluation Report is simply not there. The gap usually appears weeks after reintegration, once Human Resources Command runs the next scrub and the record comes back flagged. Because iPERMS is the long-term archive that boards, selection panels, and civilian employers all pull from, a missing OER can quietly follow you across postings and post-Army job applications.
The good news is that most missing OERs can be reconstructed through the Army Evaluation Entry System. The process is paperwork-heavy but rarely mysterious, and the steps below walk through what to assemble, who to contact, and how to escalate. If you are posted with an allied unit in Australia, at Holsworthy, Russell Offices in Canberra, or out of Townsville, the time-zone gap with the United States is part of the challenge rather than a reason to delay.
Why OERs sometimes disappear from iPERMS after a deployment
iPERMS does not generate evaluations; it stores documents uploaded through EES by an S1 clerk or a rater. When an OER goes missing, the cause is almost always upstream: the report was never entered, the senior rater never signed it in EES, or the upload was rejected for a code mismatch. Deployed environments make all three failures more common because connectivity is patchy, SRBs run late, and officers often rotate mid-rating period.
Australian postings add another wrinkle. Sitting on opposite sides of the International Date Line, a clerk in CONUS logging in at 0800 Eastern is finishing the day while you are sitting down to brekkie in Sydney. iPERMS help desk tickets can sit for 48 hours, so an issue that would take one phone call at Fort Bragg can take a full week from a Commonwealth ally's headquarters.
Gathering the paperwork before you start the correction
Before you open a ticket or walk into the S1 shop, line up the documents that prove the rating period existed. A clean packet moves the correction from "we'll look into it" to "here is your missing document uploaded today." The items you will need include:
- A copy of your DA Form 67-10 series forms signed by the rater and senior rater
- The original DA Form 1059 if an academic report is involved
- Deployment orders, award orders, and any memorandum for record tied to the rating period
- Your most recent SRB results printout showing the missing OER slot
- Your CAC login confirmed working and your EES profile unlocked
- Contact details for the rater, senior rater, and at least one witness who can verify duties
Working with your S1 and the Army evaluation entry system
Schedule a sit-down with your battalion S1 rather than emailing the issue. The NCO or officer who runs EES needs to compare your records against the DA Form 67-10 series and see where the upload broke down. In many cases the OER exists in the system but was rejected because of a mismatched administrative data code, a wrong UIC, or a deactivated rater profile.
That last failure mode is the most common. If your rater left the Army, PCSed, or rolled their profile over during the deployment, EES will not accept the OER until the rater profile is restored. Reviewing and fixing a stale profile by verifying the rater profile is often the single step that unblocks the whole submission. After the profile is live, the S1 can re-enter the report and push it into iPERMS within the same business day.
Knowing which report type belongs in the empty slot saves weeks of misdirected paperwork:
| Report type |
Who it covers |
Who signs first |
Who approves |
Storage in iPERMS |
| OER |
Commissioned officers and warrant officers |
Rater |
Senior rater |
Mandatory for promotion boards |
| NCOER |
Sergeants and above |
Rater |
Senior rater |
Mandatory for promotion boards |
| AER |
Senior NCOs in specific roles |
Rater |
Senior rater |
Mandatory for CSM and SGM selection |
| DA Form 1059 |
Academic and training courses |
Course instructor |
School commandant |
Filed with evaluation history |
Officers follow the OER path described above; NCOs use the NCOER workflow instead.
Common roadblocks when your rater cannot be reached
Sometimes the rater has no forwarding contact, especially for officers who rate downrange and transition out. When that happens, the senior rater becomes the primary witness and the S1 drafts a memorandum for record explaining the rating period. The MFR goes into the supporting documents folder inside iPERMS, where boards see it even during reconstruction.
If both the rater and senior rater are gone, the next step is to engage HRC's evaluations branch directly through a DA Form 4187 signed by your current commander. From Townsville or Holsworthy, send the packet by tracked courier rather than .mil email, because Australian internet infrastructure occasionally drops secure connections at the worst possible moment. A practical escalation path looks like this:
- Draft a memorandum for record signed by the senior rater describing the rating period and duties
- Submit a DA Form 4187 through your S1 requesting HRC intervention
- Request a copy of the rater profile from the HRC evaluations branch
- Keep a soft copy of every signed DA Form 67-10 in your own cloud storage
- Follow up with the iPERMS help desk weekly until the document appears
What to do if your OER was never written downrange
The harder case is when the OER was genuinely never written, usually because the rating period ended mid-deployment and the rater assumed a relief would complete it. The relief then assumed the original rater would close it out, and the soldier returns to find an empty slot.
Write the OER now, retroactive to the original rating period, signed by the sitting senior rater. A detailed MFR explains the late submission, and boards rarely penalise this when the documentation is honest. For officers approaching their 18-year mark, the same gap can surface when requesting a DD-214, since the form references OER history and any hole shows up immediately.
Preventing the same problem on your next set of evaluations
A clean iPERMS record after deployment is less about heroic corrections and more about habits during the rating period. Raters who sign in to EES once a week and upload a draft within thirty days of the close-out date almost never produce a missing document. Junior raters who wait until the next duty station to finish the paperwork are the ones who create the cases above.
Check your record through the iPERMS self-service portal within thirty days of any rating period ending. If the slot is empty, raise it with your rater before the PCS move, not after. From Australia, schedule the review for a US business morning rather than waiting for the next in-person S1 visit, and keep a soft copy of every DA Form 67-10 as a fallback.